NEED HELP In a population of cats, a gene that controls an observable trait has several different alleles. Which of the following best explains how genetic drift might affect the genetic makeup of this cat population over time?

It is a directed process, so it might cause an increase in the gene pool's allele frequencies.
It is a nonselective process, so it might cause an allele to disappear from the gene pool by chance.
It is a random process, so it might cause a population to reach genetic equilibrium.
It is a selective process, so it might cause an increase in the population's genetic variation.

 It is a nonselective process, so it might cause an allele to disappear from the gene pool by chance brainliest?

Explanation:

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."