scientist theorized that all life started with simple prokaryotic organisms. New species continue to evolve from existing species, creating the variety of life we see today. The following diagram shows the basic process.(diagram is in the picture) based on this diagram, do you think that organisms of the same order will share a stronger revolutionary relationship than organisms that share only the same phylum? explain your reasoning

Click on the link below

cutt.ly/rzNrBcz

Yes, I do!

Organisms that are close almost are like a family, and most are. I personally dont have a lot of reasoning to it, I just think that it is a yes.

option a is correct i.e.

explanation:

in context to the membrane of nerve impulse, the outer membrane of neuron is semi permeable that is only sodium ions can pass through the membrane i.e. smaller ions can pass through the membrane while larger ions cannot pass through it.

americans began to notice growing differences between the northern and southern sections of the country. there were more people living in cities in the north, which made it more urban. more people lived on farms in the south, which made it more rural. while many people were farmers in the northern states, there were now other ways to make a living, such as working in mechanical cotton gins factories manufacturing cloth, tools and other goods. people in the north supported high tariffs on goods imported from europe because the extra cost encouraged people to “buy american” instead. in the southern states, planters did not like tariffs because they sold most of their production to europe and bought their tools from there as well. southerners believed the protective tariff was something that only northern factory owners keep their profits high. so the southern politicians came up with an idea. they would opt out. they would simply ignore the protective tariff. it was ‘null and void’ in south carolina. the state would not collect the taxes on goods imported into south carolina, no matter what the president said they had to do. this decision led to the nullification crisis.