Please help! I will give brainliest to whoever gets it right. Address the following points in paragraph form to write your conclusion.

1. Restate the overall purpose of the experiment. (Why did you do this experiment? What did it teach you?)

2. What were the major findings? (summarize the data you collected)

3. Was the hyposthesis supported by the data? (state your hypothesis and explain how your data relates to your hypothesis)

4. How could this experiment be improved? (If you did this again what could you do differently?)

5. What could be studied next after this experiment? (What else could you test to help you better understand this topic?)

Improving your Title

A good title efficiently tells the reader what the report is about. It may include such information as the subject of the experiment (what it is about), the key research variables, the kind of research methodology used, and the overall findings of the experiment. To make your titles better, follow these guidelines:

If your title is too long (takes up more than a line), reduce it by taking out non-essential words and phrases.

If your title doesn't have enough information, make a list of the key words related to the experiment (scientific concept of the experiment, important variables, procedure, overall finding) and use the list to come up with ideas for further information.

If your title is a complete sentence (with a subject and a predicate), rewrite it so that it is not a full statement but a phrase describing the experiment.

Improving your Abstract

A good Abstract is a miniature version of the lab report in one concise paragraph and labeled Abstract.

If you are not sure what should be included in each summary sentence, use the following list as a guide:

Introduction: main objective(s) of lab; hypothesis

Methods: a quick description of the procedure

Results: statement of the overall findings

Discussion: judgment about hypothesis; explanation for judgment

Conclusion: what you learned about the scientific concept

If your Abstract is too long, look carefully at each summary sentence and take out any information that is not essential to that section of the report.

Improving your Introduction

successfully establishes the scientific concept of the lab

To establish the scientific concept for the lab you need to do two things:

1. state what the lab is about, that is, what scientific concept (theory, principle, procedure, etc.) you are supposed to be learning about by doing the lab. You should do this briefly, in a sentence or two. If you are having trouble writing the opening sentence of the report, you can try something like: "This laboratory experiment focuses on X…"; "This lab is designed to help students learn about, observe, or investigate, X…." Or begin with a definition of the scientific concept: "X is a theory that…."

2. give the necessary background for the scientific concept by telling what you know about it (the main references you can use are the lab manual, the textbook, lecture notes, and other sources recommended by the lab manual or lab instructor; in more advanced labs you may also be expected to cite the findings of previous scientific studies related to the lab). In relatively simple labs you can do this in a paragraph following the initial statement of the scientific concept of the lab. But in more complex labs, the background may require more paragraphs.

Explanation:

Restate the overall purpose of the experiment. (Why did you do this experiment? What did it teach you?)

2. What were the major findings? (summarize the data you collected)

3. Was the hyposthesis supported by the data? (state your hypothesis and explain how your data relates to your hypothesis)

4. How could this experiment be improved? (If you did this again what could you do differently?)

5. What could be studied next after this experiment? (What else could you test to help you better understand this topic

Explanation:

picture a world where computers are building made-to-order personalized robotic arms and synthetic organs, drones are circulating above mars! due to the rapid growth of technology, the future has never been more unpredictable, and it presents a huge challenge in education: we are teaching students how to work in a future that we have never been unsure of. it is widely predicted that in eight years’ time, there will be more jobs in the fields of science, mathematics, technology and engineering than in any other discipline. and, as the technology continues to develop, it will soon become clear that addressing social problems will involve more innovative thinking, and analytical and technical knowledge than ever before. undeniably, there are no subjects that encourage innovative and creative thinking, deep thought, problem solving and independence more than the stem subjects. while it is widely commented on that there is a need to reimagine the ways stem subjects are taught in schools by embracing a more interactive and innovative approach to appeal to more students, it should come as no surprise that some of the most reputable educational organizations in the world are already implementing changes to embrace stem. harvard, for example, announced in 2014 that they were increasing their computer science faculty by over 50% and has since introduced computer science as a core subject for all freshmen. the urgency of supporting stem subjects at a young age is becoming more relevant than ever, as adopting a keen interest in the curricula needs to happen early. however, beyond the age issue is one of gender.

let me know if you need more