What main idea about the nature of the cell did historical scientists disagree on? PLEASE HELP IM GONNA FAIL SCIENCE

Explanation:

Scientists didnt belive that there are cells untill robert hooke (1665). He observed the cells in a cork slice with the help of a PRIMITIVE microscope

Leeuwenhoek (1674), with the help of an improved microscope, discovered free living cells in pound water for the first time.

It was robert brown in (1831) who discovered the nucleus in the cell.

Purkinjie in 1839 coined the term 'protoplasm' for the fluid substance of the cell.

THE CELL THEORY, that all plants and animals are composed of cells and that the cell is the basic unit of life, was presented by two biologists, schleiden (1838) and schwann(1839). The cell theory was fuether expanded by virchow (1855) by suggesting that all cells aris form PRE-EXISTING cells. With the discovery of the electron microscope in 1940,it was possible to observe and understand the complex structure of the cell and its various organelles.

Well, thats the history of the discovery of cells.

there are 35 white marbles

step-by-step explanation:

y- yellow marbles

4y + 5 = 45

subtract 5 from both sides

4y = 40

divide for from both sides

y = 10

plug in 10 to get 40 yellow marbles then subtract by 5 to get 35 marbles

thus there are only 10 yellow marbles

as the gila monster consumes the eggs or young of the desert cottontail and gambel's quail, thus its main food supply is only accessible for a restricted time duration every year. however, for this, the gila monsters exhibit three adaptations, which elevate their survival rate in the desert condition.  

first, is that they possess huge bodies, and can consume greater concentrations of food during a small period. secondly, they require to feed infrequently as they can accumulate fat in their tails. ultimately, their rate of metabolism is very low, so that they can burn their reservoirs of fat gradually.