One argument in response to the "Commons" idea is that private land ownership will prevent a "tragedy" from happening. Based on the article, do you agree or disagree? Why?

agree

Explanation:

The common argument which is based on shared assets and the behavior of each individuals.

When the land ownership becomes private a tragedy is avoided as each individual treats the land with care and caution, unlike when it’s a common( shared) where they all don’t care what happens to the land or it’s aftermath so far they all gain personally. So yes when it’s a private land then and then do they truly prevent any tragedy associated with common to happen.

lipid

explanation: