Do you agree or disagree with the argument that humans are fundamentally incapable, as a species, of living sustainably?

I disagree because there are examples that contradict this assertion

Explanation:

In the last years, sustainable human development has been one of the most important challenges in order to avoid Earth's collapse. In accordance with this aim, many people around the world are learning to responsibility use natural resources and live in communion with ecosystems capable of providing the primary matter required for economic progress. Examples of human groups that learned to use the available resources in a sustainable way include isolated societies living in forest areas, which live independently from the external globalization phenomenon. Moreover, in many countries, the percentage of energy obtained from clean sources is progressively increasing year by year, thereby supporting the fact that human societies can live sustainably.

i would go with b

cytokinesis occurs after telophase so that eliminates d

and the entire reason for cytokinesis is for cellular reproduction

i know can you plzz me with this question im sorry i didt answer your question i just need hel.