The gluten-free diet was originally intended for people with celiac disease, but it’s now become a new fad diet for the general population. Many people state that gluten-free diets are beneficial for people who aren’t sensitive to gluten, while others suggest that there’s no benefit. Use credible resources to evaluate the argument yourself. Do you think there’s sufficient scientific evidence to support the use of a gluten-free diet in people who aren’t sensitive to gluten? Provide evidence that supports your argument.

The gluten free diet is helpful for the people that are sensitive to food with gluten it which occurs due to the celiac disease. It was originally meant for the such people but it becomes a new fad. However, there is no compelling evidence to support that gluten free diet helps in health improvements n non sensitive people.

In other hand there are majority of doctors are against the use of gluten free diet is not good for various body organs like heart. A study concluded that there are lower risk of heart disease in people take more gluten. Doctors and various study suggests that people with no celiac disease should not avoid gluten.

c.) polymerase chain reaction

- "unlike the original dna fingerprinting method, dna profiling does not use restriction enzymes to cut the dna. instead it uses the polymerase chain reaction (pcr)? to produce many copies of specific str sequences. pcr is an automated procedure that generates lots of copies of a specific sequence of dna."

blah

explanation:

bc blah