The author writes, "Gerardo Ceballos, a researcher at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico in Mexico City, acknowledged that the study is written in usually alarming tones for an academic research paper. ‘It wouldn't be ethical right now not to speak in this strong language to call attention to the severity of the problem,' he said." What evidence in the article supports the claim that this is a severe problem?

explanation:

okay now i don't know this but for the pints nothing else to say bye

answers are:

lysogenic     viral dna merges with host cell dna

lysogenic     no symptoms

lytic               viral dna takes over

lysogenic     virus does not destroy host cell

lytic               virus destroys host cell

lytic               induces symptoms of viral infection

lysogenic       cell reproduces and spreads provirus

this is more of a statement than a question. is there answers to go along with this, or is it opinion based?