A month after the conviction, you discover that a DNA sample was found at the crime scene and was never tested. You believe that it might exonerate your client. Unfortunately, the appellate court rejects your petition, citing the case of District Attorney v. Osborne. The decision in this case held that:

the jury has the final say so...and they did not except it so that's the final decision

Explanation:

due to the fact that it skipped a generation we can tell it is definitely not a dominant trait, therefore it must be recessive. i think this is right let me know!

explanation:

option a and d is the correct answer

i hope this u

plz mark as the brainliest answer