Which would be the result if the electron microscope had not been invented?
question 34 options:

images of cells and microorganisms would remain blurry.

microscope magnification would be limited to 1000×.

scientists would be unable to view different cell organelles.

the atoms of elements would not have been discovered.

The result if the electron microscope had not been invented would be Microscope magnification would be limited to 1000×.

Explanation:

A high resolution of images of biological and non biological specimens can be obtained by the use of Electron microscopy. The structure of cells, organelles, tissues can be studied in detail with the help of an electron microscope. The usage of electrons helps in getting a high resolution of images in an electron microscope.  

Electrons with shorter wavelength are used for getting the illumination. A compound light microscope has a resolution of 500 times lesser than the electron microscope's magnification. When this type of microscope is not invented then the magnification will have been limited to 1000x.

the answer is trees if i'm not mistaken

1: most common garden plants prefer loam — soils with a balance of different-sized mineral particles (approximately 40% sand, 40% silt, and 20% clay) with ample organic matter and pore space. however, some plants grow better in sandy soils, while others are well-adapted to clay soils.

2: available water capacity is the maximum amount of plant available water a soil can provide. it is an indicator of a soil's ability to retain water and make it sufficiently available for plant use. available water capacity is the water held in soil between its field capacity and permanent wilting point.

3: it is the same for all living things (plants and animals). it also includes very tiny organisms that our eyes cannot see. they are known as microorganisms, and include viruses, bacteria and fungi.