Which method is the typical first step when scientists communicate their scientific results?
placing the results on an internet site to maximize readership
distributing the results in press releases to make them well established
submitting the results to a scientific journal for a peer review
declaring the results in a tv interview for public feedback

submitting the results to a scientific journal for a peer review

Explanation:

Assembling the results into an article and submitting them to a journal for peer review is a long-standing and important part of scientific research, Peer review means that experts in the field will look at the data and scrutinise it for errors, poorly drawn conclusions, bad data etc.

Once a paper has gone through this procedure, it is considered to be "part of the conversation" and scientists can communicate it to a wider audience, such as sharing it on blogs, in the news and on TV (if it is of wide enough interest). Once it has been peer reviewed, it can also be cited by other scientists in their own work

prism b but im not for sure

succession returns a disturbed

ecosystem to a more stable state. this is also classified into two (2) types:

primary succession and secondary succession. the primary succession arises when

a new land is transformed and a bare rock has been exposed providing an environment

that can be occupied for the first time. while, secondary succession occurs

when a previously occupied environment was disturbed that kills much of all its

community

explanation: