In the following conversation, which group discussion technique does emily
most clearly show?
han:
even though (the author of the article is saying that the
radiation hasn't made japan's exported food dangerous to
eat, he's pulling out all the stops to make it seem as if
japan really messed things up, even though there's proof
the disaster couldn't be prevented.
emily:
so you think the theme isn't really about the contamination,
but about how japan can't prevent natural disasters from
destroying the reactors?
a. challenging established ideas
o
b. assessing the claims of your discussion partner
o
c. using evidence to support your conclusions
o
d. using parallel structure and audience appeals