The development of simple stone tools by early hominids led to the ability to procure meat more efficiently. this in turn led to the change in diet that included larger amounts of protein. many scholars believe that this shift in diet was a significant part of how our ancient ancestors adapted so quickly to a varied set of environments, and thus were able to begin cultural development. this demonstrates the intimate connection between:
a. evolution and technology b. nature and nurture
c. culture and environment d. biology and psychology

nature and nurture

Explanation:

According to my research on studies conducted by anthropologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this demonstrates the intimate connection between nature and nurture. This can be said because in the question it illustrates how the advanced ability to hunt animals (nature) was a main aspect of our change in diet and ability to adapt rapidly (nurture).

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

c

explanation:

idk

hey bro i looked it up on google the structure of the eye-spot in euglena viridie, e. ehrenbergii, and phacus pyriyorme is not as franzé haa described it. the so-called “crystal body” and “lens bodies” were not found in any of the individuals of the species examined by me. as earlier observers have stated, the eye-spot consists simply of a mass of pigment granules arranged in a single layer, and probably embedded in a protoplasmic framework, but the latter could not be seen, and its presence was only inferred from the fact that the pigment granules must be held together in some way, thd the eye-spot as a whole is capable of expansion, and that the pigment granules can be separated from each other.

hope this   and an i get brainlsiest