Ascientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. what would her evidence have to show for her to be correct? strong genetic similarities in closely related organisms and weak genetic similarities in distantly related organisms. weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms. strong physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms. weak physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.

i think it is b.)

Explanation:Weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.

Weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.

Explanation:

An evolution can be define modification of the organisms among successive generations due to genetic, morphological and physiological changes. DNA is a genetic material which is being inherited by the offsprings from their parents. The concept of evolution suggests that how modern organisms are similar to their once living ancestor organisms.

Weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms. is the correct option. As according to the concept of evolution, if two organisms are closely related so there should be existence of more amount of genetic similarities among them.

yes it is   dangerous

explanation:

because that foot is discusting and could get you sick