Ablog post published on google by a high school student and reviewed by her friend is included as a citation in a science paper. is this source considered a peer-reviewed paper? why or why not?

a. this is considered a peer-reviewed paper because the variables used were reviewed by other scientists to make sure they were labeled correctly. b. this isn't considered a peer-reviewed paper because peer-reviewed papers are published only in books. c. this is considered a peer-reviewed paper because it was reviewed by a student peer. d. this isn't considered a peer-reviewed paper because it wasn't reviewed by other scientists in the field.

Option D, This isn't considered a peer-reviewed paper because it wasn't reviewed by other scientists in the field.

Explanation:

A paper/research article is said to be peer-reviewed when it is written by a scientist/scholar and reviewed by another expert scientists/peers of the same field before publication.

Here in this case , the blog posted by the high school student was not reviewed by any field/sector expert before publication and thus , this source of paper can not be considered as peer reviewed paper.  

the dark variety, as they are not visible on the dark tree barks

explanation:

and after water is usually warmed by the sun the water temperature raises and then evaporates .