Me out with this

you!
for question 2, i think its 2000 but correct me if i'm wrong.

Image 1 -

The carrying capacity is just as the name suggests, the maximum number of individuals that can make up a population.

Why are the others wrong?

Migration might change the carrying capacity, depending on where the species go, it can increase or decrease, but it's not the only way. A - Wrong.

It can actually be for any type of species, no matter what their distribution type is. B - Wrong.

The survivorship patter doesn't actually matter, and it really doesn't have much to do with the carrying capacity. C - Wrong.

It can vary from population to population, depending on their reproduction rate and their location (amount of resources available). D - Wrong.

Why is E. right?

It's the only one that provides us with truthful information, in a way that makes sense. If enironmental conditions change, it might not affect a population directly.

Let's say, it's a dear population. If it gets too cold, the plants they feed on might die, and they will not have food, but the cold isn't affecting them directly - they will not die because of the cold itself, but because of what the cold will do to their food.

E.

Image 2 -

The growth pattern we see is called logistic growth - the population grows until the carrying capacity and then stabilizes.

Since they give us a chart with a logistic growth, basing oursefls on the definition above, the limit of the growth line will be the carrying capacity of the population, therefore, 2000.

200.

Hope it helped,

BioTeacher101