In which of the following scenarios would environmental restoration not be a viable option? -trees are harvested by a lumber company using selective cutting techniques. - an indigenous tribe living in a rainforest overhunts a species of antelope one year. - a pharmaceutical company removes medicinal berries from bushes on the forest floor. - an endangered species of lizard is discovered in a heavily logged section of forest. -an invasive species of leaf-eating beetle thrives in a forest in which it has no natural predators.

 An indigenous tribe living in a rainforest overhunts a species of antelope one year.

Environmental restoration refers to the process of assisting the recovery of the natural environment which has been damaged and destroyed by human activities or a natural disaster. It is done by growing more number of trees by the process of afforestation, or by providing protection to endangered plant or animal species.

An indigenous tribe living in a rainforest overhunts a species of antelope one year is not a viable option for environmental restoration because this will limit the population of antelope in that area. It may also, result in the extinction of antelope species from the rainforests hence, does not support restoration.

the "dirty dozen" chemicals banned in an international treaty are formally known as persistent organic pollutants, or pops. the united nations environment program provided this background on what they are and what they can do to humans and wildlife.

i hope this