For a claim about the natural world to be considered scientific, what attributes must it have? it must be consistent with only a small portion of relevant observations or data. it must be applicable to future events and occurrences. it must be based on scientific observations that can be repeated in a controlled setting. it must be open to modification if new evidence doesn't completely support it.

Can someone pretty me with this ? it’s urgent.compare the three theories of emotion. here are the three theories of emotion. cannon-bard theory of emotion: the belief that both psychological arousal and emotional experience are produced stimultaneously ( at the same time) by the same nerve stimulus. james-lange theory of emotion: the belief that emotional experience is a reaction to bodily events occurring as a result of an external situation. ( “ i feel sad because i am crying.) schachter-singer theory of emotion: the belief that emotions are jointly determined by a nonspecific kind of psychological (bodily function) arousal and its interpretation, based on environmental ( natural surroundings) cues. which of these theories makes most sense to you? why. your response should be written using proper english spelling and grammar. and it needs to be 10 complete sentences.