In ancient times, scientists believed that matter could be destroyed by burning or breaking. modern scientists believe that matter cannot be destroyed. what best accounts for these different opinions? a. scientists with varied backgrounds make different interpretations b. scientists come up with different hypotheses without enough evidence c. scientists believe in discarding all interpretations which were made in the past d. scientists propose different hypotheses to include all the scientific possibilities

C. Scientists believe in discarding all interpretations which were made in the past.

Explanation:

C. is the correct option because modern scientists believe that the ancient scientist might be lacking technology which is available with modern scientists. Thus, the methodology followed by them to prove the hypothesis could be inefficient to yield results. Hence, they discard research done by ancient scientists.

succession returns a disturbed

ecosystem to a more stable state. this is also classified into two (2) types:

primary succession and secondary succession. the primary succession arises when

a new land is transformed and a bare rock has been exposed providing an environment

that can be occupied for the first time. while, secondary succession occurs

when a previously occupied environment was disturbed that kills much of all its

community

explanation: