The what went wrong? feature in chapter 12 focuses on a dispute between goldieblox, a toy company, and the beastie boys, a musical group. the dispute centered on goldieblox's use of a beastie boys song in a commercial without the beastie boy's permission. to justify their actions, goldieblox argued that their use of the song was justified based on the legal principle of use. inconsequential fair non-restricted limited trivial

The answer "Fair": GoldieBlox argued that their use of the song was justified based on the legal principle of "Fair" use.

Explanation:

GoldieBlox once posted a video on its website. The video, which showed some young girls creating a detailed and entertaining Rube Goldberg device, had an audio of the Beastie Boys song “Girls” with the original lyrics altered in a way that empowered girls and women. The Beastie Boys felt that it was wrong for GoldieBlox to use their music without their permission because it infringed on the rights to their intellectual property. GoldieBlox argued that the use of Beastie Boys’ music was justified on the basis of the legal principle of fair use.

answer; ///(calligraphy)is very popular in chinese culture;

satin. 

"very shiny satin may look great in the fabric store or in the sewing room, but once onstage it can look fake and cheap as it reflects the light from the fixtures."