After watching the morning news, roommates kelly and rob argued about whether or not a man on trial should have been sentenced to prison for robbing goods and giving to those on welfare. rob argued that the man should not have been convicted because he broke the law for a good cause while kelly argued that the man should be convicted because it is against the law to steal so the man's behavior was wrong. based on lawrence kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning which of the following statements would kohlberg agree with? a. kelly is at a higher level of moral reasoning than rob. b. rob is at a higher level of moral reasoning than kelly. c. rob and kelly are at the same level of moral reasoning. d. rob has more knowledge than kelly concerning criminal behavior.

like many students at university, you may be unhappy about the results you attain in exams. you may feel that even with all you are doing there must be something more -- or different-- you could be doing to get better grades. we have all at some time or other heard of that student who only studies a couple of hours for final exams and scores a's every time. we stand in awe of those who seem to breeze through without undue effort and seem to need very little in the way of studying to nail an exam. the reasons for success, in what i think are the vast majority of cases, are less esoteric than many students think: successful students consistently apply a series of productive strategies with view to attaining clearly identified learning and grade goals throughout the academic term.