What is the major difference between the majority and dissenting opinions on false speech and the stolen valor act? write two to three sentences that contrast the opinions.

The majority writes that false speech is protected as long as it does not cause harm. The writer worries that the Stolen Valor Act would set a dangerous precedent for future laws. The dissent believes that false speech is rarely protected by the First Amendment, and the Act is constitutional

The dissenting opinions stated that it was a constitutional limitation of free speech. The majority opinions stated that lying is okay in cases of trying to protect oneself or community.

Im pretty sure it would be climax