According to government data, 22 percent of children in the United States under the age of 6 years live in households with incomes that are classified at a particular income level. A simple random sample of 300 children in the United States under the age of 6 years was selected for a study of learning in early childhood. If the government data are correct, which of the following best approximates the probability that at least 27 percent of the children in the sample live in households that are classified at the particular income level? (Note: z represents a standard normal random variable.)

answer:

2

explanation:

1+1 = 2

the reason this is so is because of basic addition. we can double check this without using addition if you really want. if you take 1+1=x, subtract 1 from both sides than you get 1 = x - 1. subtract x from both sides and you get 1 - x = -1. subtract 1 from both sides again and you get -x = -2. finally, multiply both sides by -1 to get x = 2. subtraction is still technically addition you say? fine, have it your way. 1 + 1 = x. by definition, adding something to itself is the same thing as multiplying it by 2. this means we can technically rewrite the equation as

1 * 2 = x. now all we have to do is solve it. 1 * 2 = x when simplified results in 2 = x, or x = 2. this shows 1 + 1 = x. you say you want a real answer. you want me to start you from the ground up? well i would, but that would practically just be stealing from what was written on this website: go check it out if you really need to.

answer:

joe mamma

explanation: this is a dumb meme that's been going around for a while now, where someone mentions the name joe, the other person asks who joe is, and the first person responds with joe mamma.

answer:

subtract

explanation: