subject

Ap gov frq (A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) and Oregon v. Smith (1989).

(B) Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of Wisconsin v. Yoder led to a different holding than the holding in Oregon v. Smith.

(C) Describe an action that members of the state legislature could take if they disagreed with the decision in Oregon v. Smith.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Advanced Placement (AP)

question
Advanced Placement (AP), 23.06.2019 20:00
With my drivers ed and i’ll mark you brainliest + free 10 points adjusting the driver's seat is a. only necessary when you purchase a new vehicle b. usually enough to make up for an arm or leg injury c. not necessary if you're only driving a few miles d. not just for comfort
Answers: 1
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 25.06.2019 10:30
And intervening opportunity is an example of
Answers: 1
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 26.06.2019 15:30
Yo eat these free points uuppp cuz why not, right man? 30 to nom nom nym on.
Answers: 2
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 27.06.2019 10:30
Which action would probably not result in good test performance or lessened anxiety? a. visualizing success b. arriving to class right before the test c. taking deep breaths d. getting a good night's sleep before the test
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Ap gov frq (A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 27.03.2021 22:50
question
Geography, 27.03.2021 22:50
question
Biology, 27.03.2021 23:00
Questions on the website: 13722367