If resources are finite, and you as an individual or member of society use a disproportionate amount of resources compared to someone else, would you be willing to give up some of your resources to support a larger population on the whole even if your standard of living might decline? why or why not?

In my viewpoint, I am willing to give up some of my resources to support a larger population even if my standard of living might decline because I am not a selfish kind of person.

I believe that sharing what you have that could do good to many would return as a blessing through new opportunities and possibilities. As the saying goes “the more you give, the more you receive”.

Moreover, if I had gain a disproportionate amount of resources compared to someone else before then I still believe that I could gain that again through hard work and dedication. After all, maybe it is my purpose to serve others in this  so-called “life”.

i think the answer is a

answer:

overall, nba 2k20 is a better looking game than nba 2k19, but the improvement is slight. it comes down to lighting and a new facial animation concept that makes the players look more life like. a lot of people say its trash, but i'm a bog fan so i don't care i was going to play it regardless. i have a three level scorer, he's lit i'm grinding hip to top rep,